MOHARRAM ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/1930/2025 · 2025-03-04
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124644 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124644 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12928-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1930 of 2025 Petitioner :- Moharram Ali Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Indrapal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner is seeking protection and security. He may approach the concerned authority, who may get the
facts verified and do the needful. If security personnel are required for execution of any decree, then, the Court below can do the needful as per law and, if any such directions are issued by the Court below, then, the District Authorities would be obliged to comply the same promptly.
3. The petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.]
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench