SURAJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/2103/2025 · 2025-02-20
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124624 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11102 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2103 of 2025 Petitioner :- Suraj Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Shri Manjeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners appeared in the recruitment process for the post of Constable in Civil Police, for which the advertisement was issued on 23.12.2023. The petitioners appeared in the written examination and were declared successful and were again issued another admit card for appearance in the documents verification and physical standards test. The physical test was conducted on various dates in January, 2025 and the height of all the petitioner was found to be 167.3 cms and the difference is less than one centimeter, inasmuch as, had the height been 168 cms, they would have qualified to the next level of the examination.
3. Considering the fact that the difference in height is less than one centimeter and the same is measured physically, there are chances of human error and as interference has already been shown in other matters and the Medical Board is also in operation, let the height of the petitioner be re-determined, for which purposes they are directed to move an appropriate representation before the opposite party no.2- Secretary, Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotions Board, Lucknow, who shall pass necessary orders for re- examination of the height of the petitioners before the duly constituted Medical Board at Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submitted that in case one more opportunity is granted, they would abide by the decision of the said Board and would not agitate the matter any further.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 20.2.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench