IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH. 214 CWP-831-2019 (O&M) Date of Decision: 11.08.2025. DHANPAT AND ANOTHER ... Petitioner(s) Versus NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, KURUKSHETRA AND ANOTHER ... Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. PRESENT: Mr. Tejpal Singh Dhull, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Nilesh Kant, Advocate, Mr. A.S.Virk, Advocate, for the respondents. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J (ORAL) Seeking quashing of the action of the respondent Institute in not allowing the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 to apply for the post of Junior Assistant and Accountant respectively, the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners contends that the petitioners could not make to the final selection list, hence, the present writ petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has no objection to the same. In view of above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. August 11, 2025. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) raj arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAJ KUMAR ARORA 2025.08.13 13:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document