HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.1959 of 2024 Udham Singh ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Abhishek Verma, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. V.S. Rawat, AGA for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No.695 of 2024, under Sections 318, 319 & 62 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 as well as under Sections 12(2), 2(g), 2(3) and 2(4) of the Uttarakhand Competitive Examination (Measures for Control and Prevention of Unfair Means in Recruitment) Act, 2023, Police Station Kotwali Haridwar, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. According to the FIR, the applicant had got co- accused Pankaj Kumar for writing exam on behalf of Kuldeep Singh. They were caught before they could execute their plan. 2 4. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that it is a case of attempt only, no offence, as such, has been done. 5. The factual narration has not been denied by the learned State Counsel. It makes out a case for bail. 6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 7. The bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 08.01.2025 Ravi