Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12458 (RAJ)

KALURAM @ SHIVA S/O PRABHUDAYAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4165/2025 · 2025-04-09

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15847] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 4165/2025 Kaluram @ Shiva S/o Prabhudayal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dhab Ka Nala, Chimanpura, Police Station Amer, District Jaipur City. (At Present At Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shantanu Bansal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 09/04/2025 1. Instant 3rd bail application has been filed by petitioner under Section 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 07/2024 registered at Police Station- Chandwaji, District- Jaipur Rural for offence(s) under Sections 365, 342, 394 & 120B IPC. 2. It has been stated that the petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2024 and in the present case after submission of charge sheet, only statement of complainant has been recorded. No other witnesses have been examined. In other criminal case for offence u/s 379, petitioner is already on bail and conclusion of trial would take considerable time. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application and states that considering the previous antecedents of the petitioner, he may not be released on bail. 4. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:15847] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4165/2025] 4. Considering the nature of charges and the fact that petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2024 and has already been released on bail in other criminal case for offence u/s 379 IPC,;’ this Court without commenting on merits of the case, deems it just and proper to release the petitioner on bail. 4. Accordingly, the 3rd bail application is allowed and it is ordered that accused-petitioner Kaluram @ Shiva S/o Prabhudayal shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 5. However, in addition to the usual terms and conditions of bail, taking into consideration the previous criminal antecedents of accused-petitioner Kaluram, it is hereby directed that: (i) Accused-petitioner shall mark his attendance quarterly before the concerned Police Station i.e. Police Station- Chandwaji, District- Jaipur Rural in the first week of every 3 months. (ii) Accused-petitioner shall not induce or influence or temper with any prosecution evidence/witness. (iii) Accused-petitioner shall not repeat the similar nature of offence. (iv) Accused-petitioner shall not leave Jaipur City without leave of the trial Court. (v) In case, accused-petitioner is found involved in similar offences, during bail granted by this Court or breach of conditions is reported or comes to the notice of the Court, the same shall be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail, granted by this Court. (SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/4