Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124577 (ALL)

RATI JAIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/1483/2025 · 2025-04-25

Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:23808-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1483 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rati Jain Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar,Satish Gulati Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Hari Anuj Bahadur Sinha Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 3 and learned counsel for opposite party no.4. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has sought quashing of the First Information Report No. 0253 of 2024, under Sections 281, 125 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Mahanagar, District Lucknow. Petitioner also pray for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in the aforesaid case crime number. 3. On 19.02.2025, parties were directed to appear before the Senior Registrar for verification of compromise. 4. The report of the Senior Registrar of this Court dated 22.02.2025 is on record, according to which, he has verified the compromise on 22.02.2025. The original compromise is on record which has been annexed as Annexure-2 to the petition. 5. According to the terms of the compromise, parties have decided to withdraw all the cases filed by them against each other including FIR No. 0253 of 2024, under Sections 281, 125 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Mahanagar, District Lucknow. 6. Learned counsel for the parties state that terms of the compromise have been read and understood and now there is no dispute between the parties. 7. Intent is clear, the informant, who is a signatory to the compromise, does not want to press the FIR, therefore, no purpose would be served in allowing the proceedings even if charge sheet has been filed before the court below to go on considering the nature of the dispute. 8. Accordingly, the impugned FIR, which is the basis to serve consequential proceedings of investigation and thereafter filing of charge sheet, if any, is hereby quashed. Consequently, all proceedings taken consequent to the lodging of the FIR including charge sheet, if any, filed before the court below stand quashed. 9. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed. 10. The Senior Registrar of this Court shall communicate this order to the court concerned for correcting its record, accordingly. 11. Learned AGA shall communicate this order to the investigating officer. . (R.M.N. Mishra, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 25.4.2025 Dhirendra/ Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench