Regular S. No. 16 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 168/2022, CrlM(555/2022) Firdousa Akhter … Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None V/s Saleem ur Rehman … Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Salih Pirzada, Advocate with Ms. Syed Ainain Qadiri, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE O R D E R 24-09-2025 Perusal of the record of the proceedings would reveal that on 9.9.2024, neither the petitioner nor her counsel appeared so also was the position on the next date i.e., 5.2.2025. Thereafter, on 15.7.2025, arguing counsel for the petitioner did not appear and the matter was adjourned at the request of proxy counsel while making it clear that in case the arguing counsel for the petitioner does not appear, the matter would be heard and determined in his absence. On two previous dates, although the matter was taken up for consideration out of turn, none was present on behalf of petitioner. Today as well none appears for the petitioner. Record of the proceedings reveal that prior to filing this petition, respondent herein had challenged the order of Revisional Court, viz. 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, in a petition, diarized as CRMC no.124/2018, which succeeded, quashing Revisional Court order dated 31.08.2018. This order, however, was thrown to challenge by petitioner herein before the Supreme Court in Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No.749/2019, which came to be dismissed vide order dated 21.02.2022. Having regard to the aforesaid position obtaining in the matter, the petitioner seemingly has lost interest in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (JAVED IQBAL WANI) JUDGE Srinagar 24-09-2025 N Ahmad Nissar Ahmad Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 06.10.2025 11:42