Golla Srinivasa Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/7644/2024 · 2025-08-11
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12452 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12452 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010146292024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No. 7644 of 2024 Between:
1. GOLLA SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. RAMA LINGESWARA RAO, AGED 53 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.G3, SRINIVASA TOWERS, 13TH WARD,MACHERLA (V AND M), PALNADU DISTRICT (FORMERLY GUNTUR DISTRICT). ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, GUNTUR (PALNADU) DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GURAZALA DIVISION, GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, MACHERLA DIVISION, GUNTUR (PALNADU) DISTRICT. 6. THE TAHSILDAR, MACHERLA MANDAL, GUNTUR (PALNADU) DISTRICT. 7. THE MANDAL SURVEYOR, MACHERLA MANDAL, O/O.
TAHSILDAR, MACHERLA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 8. KANNEKANTI ESWARACHARI, S/O. MALLIKARJUNACHARI, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 20-7-9/C, SANGADIGUNTA, CHOUTRA CENTRE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. KANNEKANTI MAHESH BABU, S/O. ESWARACHARI, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 100, SATYASAI PLAZA, REKAPALLIVARI STREET, GUNTUR, GUNTUR
2
DISTRICT. 10. BONIGE RAMESH BABU, , S/O. JOHN BABU, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O. PWD COLONY, MACHERLA TOWN AND MANDAL, GUNTUR (PALNADU) DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the survey conducted by the Respondents 6 and 7 without reference to the earlier surveys conducted by the higher authorities where under it was held that no land is available on ground and without passing any order as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the statutory provisions as ab-initio void and set-aside the said proceedings and, (b) set-aside the entry of the name of the unofficial respondents as pattadar and possessor of the land in an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in survey number 199/A said to have been purchased by the unofficial respondents under sale deed dated 01.02.2021 holding that the whole proceedings are contrary to the Provisions under Section 3, 4, 5 and Rule-9 of the ROR Act and without any notice to the affected parties/ interested persons and without holding any enquiry as without jurisdiction and consequently set-aside the entries made in the revenue records pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAJA REDDY KONETI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. D KRISHNA MURTHY
2. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy available under law and the same is also endorsed on the bundle. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.08.2025
siva
4
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.7644 of 2024
Date: 12.08.2025
siva