IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7151 of 2025 Date of Decision: 02.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Raj Kumar & others …….Petitioners Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation & others … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioners, on instructions, states that the petitioners would be content and satisfied in case they are permitted to make representation to the respondents for redressal of their grievance in terms of judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in CWPOA No.2343 of 2020, titled as Vikram Singh versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation alongwith connected matters, with the direction to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner. 2. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, while putting appearance on behalf of the respondents, fairly states that representation, if any, filed by the petitioners shall be decided in accordance with law. 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 3. Consequently, in view of afore innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioners and fair stand taken by learned counsel for the respondents, this Court sees no impediment in accepting the prayer made on behalf of the petitioners and accordingly, the present petition is disposed of, with liberty reserved to the petitioners to file representation to the respondents within a period of one week, praying therein for consideration of their case in light of judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Vikram Singh’s case(supra), which in turn, shall be decided by the respondents within a period of four weeks. Needless to say, authority concerned, while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners and pass detailed speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, if they still remain aggrieved. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. p (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 02,2025 (shankar)