Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Meghalaya · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1245 (MEG)

RAJA CHETRY v. THE SETTLEMENT OFFICER, GHADC, TURA AND ANOTHER

WP(C)/377/2024 · 2025-02-13

H S Thangkhiew

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 07 Regular List HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG WP(C) No. 377 of 2024 Date of Decision: 13.02.2025 Shri Raja Chetry … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. Settlement Officer, Garo Hills Autonomous District Council, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. 2. The Town Planning Officer, Office of the Meghalaya Urban Development Authority, Tura West Garo Hills District, Meghalaya. … Respondent(s) Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. S. Thapa, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S. Dey, Adv. (For R 1) Mr. E. Lalsangluaia, Adv. (For R 2) i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc: ii) Whether approved for publication Yes/No in press: 2025:MLHC:62 (ORAL) 1. Mr. S. Dey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, today has produced a document showing that the demarcation of the petitioner’s land had been conducted on 13.12.2024 at 11:30 A.M. He submits that as the demarcation has been done, the matter perhaps may be closed. 2. Mr. S. Thapa, learned counsel for the petitioner though not disputing the fact that demarcation has been done, submits that the manner in which the demarcation that was carried out was not scientific at all. 3. Notwithstanding the objections, as the demarcation as directed had been concluded, nothing remains for consideration in the present writ petition, inasmuch as, if the petitioner is still aggrieved he has recourse to further remedy. 4. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of. A copy of the demarcation report is taken on board and marked as ‘X’. JUDGE Meghalaya 13.02.2025 “V. Lyndem-PS” 2025:MLHC:62 Digitally signed by VALENTINO LYNDEM Date: 2025.02.13 16:11:45 IST