[2025:RJ-JP:14003] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 4157/2025 Janral @ Jarnail S/o Masru, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Jatoli, Police Station Kaithwara, District Deeg. (Currently In Sub- Jail Deeg, Rajasthan) ---- AccusedPetitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 27/03/2025 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this second bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No.42/2024 registered with the Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 354 & 427 of IPC. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material made available on record. 4. The first bail application bearing No.916/2025 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 03.02.2025 with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh bail application after passing of order in regard to framing of charges by the learned trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:14003] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4157/2025] 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed on record before this Court the order of framing of charges passed by the learned trial Court and as per the said order, all the charges against the petitioner are said to be in collusion with other co-accused. The petitioner has been charged for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 325 & 307 of IPC with the aid of Section 149 of IPC. 6. Co-accused persons namely; Masru S/o Juhru, Kursid s/o Juhru, Innas S/o Juhru, Karnail S/o Masru, Taiyab S/o Misal & Jahid S/o Kursid have already been granted the benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 13.12.2024 & 21.09.2024 7. Taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that the charges against the present petitioner and against the other co- accused persons, who have already been given benefit of anticipatory bail by this Court, have been framed for the same offences, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, [2025:RJ-JP:14003] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4157/2025] on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /24