Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124423 (ALL)

NEELU RASTOGI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/2084/2025 · 2025-02-19

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10867 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2084 of 2025 Petitioner :- Neelu Rastogi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Secondary Edu. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Shukla,Alok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri D.C. Pathak, learned Additional Chief Standing counsel for the respondents. 2. No notice be issued to the respondent No.4 taking in view of nature of order proposed to be passed. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.03.2024 while working as Assistant Teacher, her post retiral dues have still not been paid. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter at some length prays that in this regard she may be permitted to submit a representation to the respondent No.3 for redressal of her grievances and the respondent No.3 be directed to consider the same in accordance with law within a specified time to which learned counsel for the respondents have no objection. 5. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a representation for the redressal of her grievances pertaining to her grievance before the respondent No.3, who may consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with rules and shall endeavour to decide the representation by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a period of eight weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench