KESHAWRAM AND ANOTHER v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, MILKIPUR, AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS
A227/1597/2025 · 2025-03-25
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124402 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124402 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16998 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1597 of 2025 Petitioner :- Keshawram And Another Respondent :- Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, Ayodhya And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners says that Gaon Sabha concerned is left to be impleaded in this petition, as such, he may be permitted to implead the said party during the course of the day. The prayer aforesaid is acceded, as the same has not been opposed. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to implead the aforesaid party in the memo of this petition during the course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the parties. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The instant petition has been preferred seeking following main relief(s):-
"Issue an order or direction to Opposite Party No. 1 to decide the Case No. 60+61 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. 199954042345040082 + 199954042345040083) (Keshavram and others versus Siyaram and others) filed under section 9A (2) of Consolidation of Holdings Act related to Village Ucchah Pali + Bhagipur, Pargana Pashchim Rath, Tahsil Milkipur, District Ayodhya, District - Ayodhya, pending before him since 01.08.97 and 22.2.2000 within some stipulated time." Taking note of the instructions placed before this Court today, which are taken on record, as per which, in nutshell, for some unavoidable reasons, the case(s)/objection(s), in issue, could not be disposed of within reasonable time and the same would now be disposed of most expeditiously on merits and also the period of pendency of the case(s)/objection(s), in issue, as well as that the petitioners namely Keshawram and Hridayram are aged about 76 years and 70 years, respectively, the instant petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Consolidation Officer, Milkipur, Ayodhya to conclude the proceedings of the case(s), quoted above in prayer clause, within a maximum period of six months after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 25.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench