Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124401 (PNJ)

NAVPREET KAUR v. PRIYANKA MEHTANI

COCP/5331/2025 · 2025-12-09

Pankaj Jain

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[105+218 Navpreet Priyanka M Passport Of Coram : Present: PANKAJ J CM-23834- [1] record. COCP-533 [2] been filed same is tak [3] [4] representin [5] passed. Th [6] [7] disposed o 09.12.2025 ‘R. Sharma' +218] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PU AT CHANDIGAR CM-23834- Date of Deci reet Kaur versu nka Mehtani, Regional port Officer, Chandigarh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Mr. Rahul Kumar Prashar, Adv Ms. Shreyanshi Verma, Centr for the respondent-UOI. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) -CII-2025 Allowed, as prayed for. An 5331-2025 Compliance report by way o filed by learned counsel for the respo is taken on record. As per the said affidavit, the The aforesaid position is no senting the petitioner. In view of the above, no fu ed. The present contempt petition is Rule discharged. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH -CII-2025 in/and COCP-5331-202 f Decision : 09.12.2025 …Petitioner versus ….Respondent PANKAJ JAIN Advocate for the petitioner. Central Govt. Counsel Annexures P-4 to P-7 are taken way of affidavit dated 09.12.2025 ha e respondent-UOI in Court today. Th the order stands complied with. is not disputed by learned couns no further orders are required to b ion is accordingly disposed off. neous application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 2025 taken on 025 has ay. The counsel d to be stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.12.10 17:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document