Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124384 (ALL)

NEERAJ KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME /PRIN. SECY. HOME

BAIL/1528/2025 · 2025-05-01

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25238 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1528 of 2025 Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home /Prin. Secy. Home Counsel for Applicant :- Shubham Tripathi,Aditya Vikram Singh,Inam Uddin Ahmed Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Aditya Vikram Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhishek Kumar Singh, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 330/2024, under Sections 80 and 85 BNS and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Majhila, District-Hardoi. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 15.10.2024 against the applicant and his parents stating that the informant had got his daughter married to the applicant about six months ago, all accused persons used to harass her on demanding dowry and on 15.10.2024 the informant received information that her daughter has been killed and hanged. 4. The postmortem examination report mentions a ligature mark around neck of the dead body with a gap of 3.0 c.m. and the cause of death has been opined to be Asphyxia due to ante-mortem hanging. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in 2 the present case and he has no criminal history. 6. The applicant's father and mother have already been granted bail in the present case and copies of their bail orders have been annexed as Annexure No.9 to the bail application. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact and without making any observation which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant is also entitled to be released on bail. 8. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 9. Let the applicant- Neeraj Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] Order Date :- 01.05.2025 Arvind Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench