Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12437 (JK)

RITIKA BALI AND ANOTHER v. JAMMU MUNCIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS

WP(C)/1849/2025 · 2025-07-16

Rahul Bharti

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 1849/2025 CM No. 4185/2025 Ritika Bali & Anr. …..Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocate. Vs Jammu Municipal Corporation & Ors. .….Respondents Through: Mr. Mayank Gupta, Advocate. Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (16.07.2025) 01. In the course of hearing submissions from the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court urged the learned counsel for the petitioners to avail legal/statutory remedy if any available under the Municipal Corporation Act, 2000 with respect to the impugned order. 02. Learned counsel for the petitioners, therefore, seeks withdrawal of the present writ petition with liberty reserved. 03. Withdrawal is allowed with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioners to resort to the legal/statutory remedy, if any, with respect to the impugned course of action/order. 04. Withdrawal of the writ petition will not prejudice the rights of the petitioners with respect to the remedy as may be availed by the petitioners. 05. Disposed of along with connected application. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 16.07.2025 Bunty Serial No. 132