Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12436 (AP)

SMT. MARYADALA LAKSHMI POLAMMA v. STATE OF AP

WP/8930/2020 · 2025-06-19

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

V Tv APHC010146612020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurrsdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8930 OF 2020 Between: Smt. Maryadala lakshmi polamma, S/o. Sarveswara Rao, Aged about 62 R/o. H.No.1-26, Ravimetia, Nidadavolu-534301, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovvur Revenue Division, West Godavari District. 4. The Tahsildar, Nidadavolu Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the high handed and illegal action on the part of the respondents particularly the 4*'^ respondent in attempting to dispossess her from my possession and enjoyment of the land situated in an extent of Ac.2-90 cents covered by R.S.No.351/1 of Ravimetia Revenue Village, Nidadavolu Mandal, West Godavari District and to merge the same in the adjacent Tank without issuing any notice, without giving her > % an opfDortunity of being heard and without passing any order as opposed to Law, arbitrary, unjust, malafide, against the Principles of Natural Justice besides violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with her peaceful possession and enjoyment over the above said land in any manner including her dispossession. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with her possession and enjoyment of the land situated in an extent of Ac.2-90 cents covered by R.S.No.351/1 of Ravimetia Revenue Village, Nidadavolu Mandal, West Godavari District in any manner including the dispossession and merging of the sarfie in the adjacent Tank, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. lA NO: 2 OF 2020 Between: 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, West Godavari District at Eluru. 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovvur Revenue Division, West Godavari District. 1 4. The tahsildar, Nidadavolu Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Petitioners AND Smt. Maryadala lakshmi polamma, S/o. Sarveswara Rao, Aged about. 62 R/o. H.No.1-26, Ravimetia, Nidadavolu-534301, West Godavari District. ...Respondent Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 20.05.2020 in WP.No. 8930/2020 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: / ■^v APHC010146612020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8930/2020 [3505] Between: Smt. Maryadala Lakshmi Polamma ...PETITIONER AND State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KJYOTH I PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S) \ 2 ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner' that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive. The said submission is place on record. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, ! reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court as and when the cause of action if any arises. There shall be no order 3. as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. cn/. A. VENUGOPALA RAO assistant registrar sectI^ officer //TRUE COPY// To 1. One CC to Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] ' 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies Cnr '5. HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025 ORDER WP NO. 8930 OF 2020 1^2 0 AUG 2025 )% DISiyilSSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS