Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124357 (PNJ)

RANI v. THE PRESIDING OFFICER ELECTION TRIBUNAL CUM SDM MAJITHA I AND OTHERS

CR/7708/2025 · 2025-11-17

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 129-I Rani The Presid District Am CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU learned Ele District Am No.3 of 20 others”, file petitioner o till date alth Election Co to submit Civil Revision No.7708 of 2025 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision N Date of decision Versus Presiding Officer, Election Tribun ict Amritsar and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Balbir Singh Jaswal, Advo for the petitioner. Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punja HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present civil re ed Election Tribunal-cum-Sub Divisio ict Amritsar, respondent No.1 to de of 2024 dated 08.11.2024 titled as “R rs”, filed by the petitioner. It is submitted that the Electio ioner on 08.11.2024, despite that the ate although one year has expired. Learned counsel refers to Sec tion Commission Act, 1994 (hereinaft ubmit that under the said provisio O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.7708 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-17.11.2025 …..Petitioner ribunal-cum-SDM, Majitha-I, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA l, Advocate , Punjab. ivil revision is for directing the ivisional Magistrate, Amritsar-I, to decide the Election Petition d as “Rani vs. Sharma Masih and Election Petition was filed by the at the same has not been decided to Section 80 of the Punjab State reinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) rovision, it is incumbent upon VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.17 17.52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondent months. of respond administrat matter. It Tribunal A of Majitha Election Pe day-to-day respondent respondent examinatio for the peti required to November Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo Civil Revision No.7708 of 2025 (O & ndent No.1 to decide the Election Pe Heard. Notice of motion. Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punj espondent-State and informs this nistrative exigency there was some er. It is submitted that the present P nal Amritsar/respondent No.1 has be ajitha, due to which there was some tion Petition. It is submitted that resp day hearing. In fact, on 14.11.202 ndents No.2 to 7, who had failed to ndent No.1 and the matter is now fixe ination of respondents No.2 to 7. The above said facts are not e petitioner. In view of the above noted fac ired to be issued in the matter. Accordingly, the present civil Pending application(s), if any, ember 17, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No O & M) 2 ion Petition preferably within six , Punjab accepts notice on behalf this Court that due to some some delay in disposing of the esent Presiding Officer, Election has been given additional charge some delay in disposing of the at respondent No.1 is conducting 1.2025, it was the petitioner and iled to put in appearance before w fixed for 19.11.2025 for cross- re not denied by learned counsel ted facts, no further directions are t civil revision stands dismissed. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.17 17.52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document