RANI v. THE PRESIDING OFFICER ELECTION TRIBUNAL CUM SDM MAJITHA I AND OTHERS
CR/7708/2025 · 2025-11-17
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124357 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124357 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 129-I
Rani
The Presid District Am
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
learned Ele District Am No.3 of 20 others”, file
petitioner o till date alth
Election Co to submit Civil Revision No.7708 of 2025 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
Civil Revision N
Date of decision Versus Presiding Officer, Election Tribun ict Amritsar and others
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Balbir Singh Jaswal, Advo for the petitioner.
Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punja HI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present civil re ed Election Tribunal-cum-Sub Divisio ict Amritsar, respondent No.1 to de of 2024 dated 08.11.2024 titled as “R rs”, filed by the petitioner.
It is submitted that the Electio ioner on 08.11.2024, despite that the ate although one year has expired.
Learned counsel refers to Sec tion Commission Act, 1994 (hereinaft ubmit that under the said provisio
O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.7708 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-17.11.2025 …..Petitioner ribunal-cum-SDM, Majitha-I, …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA l, Advocate , Punjab. ivil revision is for directing the ivisional Magistrate, Amritsar-I, to decide the Election Petition d as “Rani vs. Sharma Masih and Election Petition was filed by the at the same has not been decided to Section 80 of the Punjab State reinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) rovision, it is incumbent upon VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.17 17.52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
respondent months.
of respond administrat matter. It Tribunal A of Majitha Election Pe day-to-day respondent respondent examinatio
for the peti
required to
November Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
Civil Revision No.7708 of 2025 (O & ndent No.1 to decide the Election Pe
Heard.
Notice of motion.
Mr. Puru Jarewal, DAG, Punj espondent-State and informs this nistrative exigency there was some er. It is submitted that the present P nal Amritsar/respondent No.1 has be ajitha, due to which there was some tion Petition. It is submitted that resp day hearing. In fact, on 14.11.202 ndents No.2 to 7, who had failed to ndent No.1 and the matter is now fixe ination of respondents No.2 to 7.
The above said facts are not e petitioner.
In view of the above noted fac ired to be issued in the matter.
Accordingly, the present civil
Pending application(s), if any, ember 17, 2025
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
O & M) 2 ion Petition preferably within six , Punjab accepts notice on behalf this Court that due to some some delay in disposing of the esent Presiding Officer, Election has been given additional charge some delay in disposing of the at respondent No.1 is conducting 1.2025, it was the petitioner and iled to put in appearance before w fixed for 19.11.2025 for cross- re not denied by learned counsel ted facts, no further directions are t civil revision stands dismissed. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.17 17.52 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document