SACHIN YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/1532/2025 · 2025-02-20
S Q H Rizvi, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124347 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11192-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1532 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sachin Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelam Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mohammad Aslam Khan Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record.
2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the First Information Report dated 28.01.2025 lodged at Case Crime No. 0023 of 2025, under Sections 329(3), 62, 324(4), 351(2) of B.N.S. registered at Police Station Babu Banarasi Das (B.B.D.), District Lucknow.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
4. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another.
5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioners states that let this petition be
disposed of in view of the above said facts.
6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh
Kumar (supra). . (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.)
Order Date :- 20.2.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench