Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12431 (JHR)

PARMESHAWAR CHOUDHARY ALIAS PARMESHWAR CHAUDHARY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3636/2025 · 2025-05-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:13883] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.3636 of 2025 ------ Parmeshawar Choudhary @ Parmeshwar Chaudhary, aged about 29 years, son of Ramswarup Choudhary, resident of Village – Sulumdag, P.O.- Sigsigi, P.S.- Rehla & District- Palamu .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Khushboo Devi, aged about 23 years, wife of Parmeshwar Choudhary, resident of Village – Sulumdag, P.O.- Sigsigi, P.S.- Rehla & District- Palamu, currently residing at D/O Gopal Choudhary, Village Medhna Kala, P.O., P.S. & District- Garhwa .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashank Shekhar No.1, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 08-05-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection Complaint Case No.1337 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Section 498A, 323, 379, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, being the husband of the complainant, has treated her with cruelty in connection with demand of dowry. It is submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and general and omnibus in nature. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-08 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is next submitted that charge has not yet been framed in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the complainant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.11.2024 as is evident from para-04 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M, Garhwa in connection with Complaint Case No.1337 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the complainant and other witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/