SUMANTRA YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/1513/2025 · 2025-02-18
Sanjay Kumar Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124304 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124304 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10578 Court No. - 18 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1513 of 2025 Applicant :- Sumantra Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Tiwari,Abhishek Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of U.P./opposite party no.1 and perused the record. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the charge-sheet no. 188 of 2023 dated 17.03.2023, summoning order dated 20.07.2023 and proceedings of Case No. 17506 of 2023 (State vs. Sumantra Yadav) arising out of Case Crime No. 141 of 2023, under Sections 406, 420, 452, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Kotwali, District Barabanki pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 18, Barabanki. At the outset learned counsel for the applicant gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned charge-sheet, summoning order and impugned criminal proceedings against the applicant and confined his submission requesting to grant some protection to the applicant to surrender before the concerned court below. The learned counsel for the applicant further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction may be issued to the concerned courts below to consider and decide the bail application of the applicant expeditiously. Learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. submits that in case the applicant is not pressing the relief as sought for by him on merits and wants to surrender before the concerned court below, he has no objection if the Court grants protection to him for a short period. In view of the above, the relief as sought by the applicant in the instant application is refused.
However considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant, it is directed that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within two weeks from today and in case applies for bail, the bail application of the applicant shall be disposed of expeditiously by the courts below in accordance with law and keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922. For the period of two weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, he shall not be arrested in the above case. With the above observations and directions, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 saurabh Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench