HARSHIT SINGH S/O SHRI SHAILENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4010/2025 · 2025-03-26
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12428 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12428 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:13631] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4010/2025 Harshit Singh S/o Shri Shailendra Singh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Arjiya Road, Subhash Nagar, Near Heera Factory, Police Station Subhash Nagar, District Bhilwara (Rajasthan) (Accused Is Presently In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4011/2025
1. Shubham Singh Rajput S/o Shri Kalu Singh, Aged About 24 Years, R/o House No. F-155, Subhash Nagar, Near Heera Factory, Police Station Subhash Nagar, District Bhilwara (Rajasthan) (Accused Is Presently In Central Jail Ajmer).
2. Lalit Singh Rao S/o Shri Ratan Singh Rao, R/o House No. 203, Subhash Nagar, Near Heera Factory, Police Station Subhash Nagar, District Bhilwara (Rajasthan) (Accused Is Presently In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Singh Gurjar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 26/03/2025
1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.05/2025 registered at
[2025:RJ-JP:13631] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4010/2025] Cyber Police Station (Ajmer), District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2)(a) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely:
1. Harshit Singh S/o Shri Shailendra Singh, 2. Shubham Singh Rajput S/o Shri Kalu Singh and 3. Lalit Singh Rao S/o Shri Ratan Singh Rao, in connection with FIR No.05/2025 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station (Ajmer), District
[2025:RJ-JP:13631] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4010/2025] Ajmer, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/25-26