2025:HHC:19719 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Cr. Rev. (FC) No. 62 of 2024 Date of decision: 25.06.2025 Parveen Kumar …Petitioner Versus Smt. Anita Kumari & Anr. …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner: Ms. Anita Kumari Jalota, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Aman Parth Sharma, Advocate. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral) On 26.03.2025, the Court passed the following order:- “Learned counsel for the parties jointly stated that they have preferred an application under Section 13 (1) (b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for mutual divorce, which is pending consideration before the learned Family Court. In this view of the matter, we deem it appropriate to defer the consideration of this case by twelve weeks.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the parties have obtained the decree of mutual divorce, therefore, the instant petition has been rendered infructuous. Her statement is taken on record. 2 2025:HHC:19719 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous, so also pending applications, if any. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) 25th June, 2025 Judge (sanjeev)