PANCHMUKHI DASHINISHWAR NATH MAHADEV JI MANDIR THRU. NEXT FRIEND,VIVEK SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE AND 7 OTHERS
WPIL/175/2025 · 2025-02-27
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Manish Kumar
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124226 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124226 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11799-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 175 of 2025 Petitioner :- Panchmukhi Dashinishwar Nath Mahadev Ji Mandir Thru. Next Friend,Vivek Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Prajapati,Piyush Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Sri Ram Kewal Tripathi, learned counsel has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.5 and 7, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Ram Kewal Tripathi, learned counsel who has put in appearance on behalf of opposite parties no.5 and
7. The nature of dispute involved in the present writ petition filed in public interest is essentially a civil dispute and for grant of any relief as has been sought herein, the disputed question of facts being involved would necessarily require leading of evidence by the respective parties. This Court cannot go into the disputed questions of
facts which require leading of evidence as is well settled. The petitioner in the circumstances of the case may be well advised to take appropriate proceedings before the competent civil court for adjudicating the rights involved, if any. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.)
Order Date :- 27.2.2025 Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench