GITA DEVI @ GEETA DEVI AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/2997/2024 · 2025-03-17
Manish Choudhury
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12422 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12422 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010101972024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2997/2024 GITA DEVI @ GEETA DEVI AND 2 ORS W/O- LATE MITRADEV SINGH 2: RANI DEVI W/O- LATE ABHIMANYU KUMAR SINGH 3: RISAV KUMAR S/O- LATE ABHIMANYU KUMAR SINGH
ALL ARE R/O- VILL-CHAND PARSA TOLA MUSAHARI WARD NO13 P.O- BHAGWATIA P.S- KESHARIA DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN STATE- BIHAR PIN-845432
(AS PET. NO-3 IS MINOR THEREFORE HE IS REP. BY PET. NO-2 AS NATURAL GUARDIAN VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER/SECRETARY GAUHATI HIGH COURT OLD BUILDING GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM PIN- 781001.
Page No.# 2/3 3:THE DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY KAMRUP (M) AT GUWAHATI
REPRESENTED BY ITS MEMBER/SECRETARY P.O/P.S- PANBAZAR GUWAHATI DIST.- KAMRUP(METRO) ASSAM PIN- 781001.
4:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE SONAPUR POLICE STATION
P.O- SONAPUR DIST-KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-78240 Advocate for the Petitioner : S I AKAND, MR. R Deka Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, ASLSA
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 18.03.2025 Mr. S.I. Akand, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have already got the relief, sought for in this writ petition, and in such view of the matter, the petitioners do not want to pursue the writ petition. Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1, 3, & 4 and Mr. R. Chouhan, learned counsel representing Ms. R.S. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Assam State Legal Services Authority for the respondent no. 2 are present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Akand, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition stands closed.
Page No.# 3/3
JUDGE Comparing Assistant