Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12420 (PAT)

Anil Kumar v. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department

MJC/292/2025 · 2025-08-08

A Abhishek Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.292 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15465 of 2024 ====================================================== Anil Kumar S/o Late Kailash Mahto, Resident of Village- Bhagat Tola, Mathurapur, P.S. Khagaria, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna, Dr. N. Shrawan Kumar S/o Not known. 2. Mr. Amit Kumar Pandey, S/o Not known, The District Magistrate, Khagaria. 3. Mr. Amit Anurag, S/o Not known, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Khagaria. 4. Mr. Amrendra Kumar Jha, S/o Not known, The Block Supply Officer, Khagaria Block, Khagaria. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Roshan Kumar Mishra, Adv. Md. Waliur Rahman, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Standing Counsel 4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER 5 08-08-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the direction given by this Court vide order 03.12.2024 could not be complied as the authorities have already passed an order of cancellation on 06.06.2024. Learned counsel seeks permission of this Court to challenge the said order. 2. Having regard to the same, the present contempt is closed leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 06.06.2024 before the appellate authority within a period of four weeks from today. On such appeal being filed, the same shall be entertained and necessary orders passed on merits Patna High Court MJC No.292 of 2025(5) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 strictly in accordance with law. It is needless to mention that before passing any order, the petitioner shall be given an opportunity of hearing. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the appeal from the petitioner. Any order passed shall be communicated to the parties. 3. With the above directions, the present M.J.C. stands closed. Gauravkr/- (A. Abhishek Reddy , J) U