Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12420 (JHR)

PRAHLAD PRADHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/250/2018 · 2025-09-19

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:29097 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt Case (Civil) No. 250 of 2018 Prahlad Pradhan aged about 52 years Son of Late Gashi Nath Pradhan, resident of Village Rangring, P.O Bhalupani P.S. Karaikela District West Singhbhum. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Shri Binod Kumar, Son of not known to the petitioner, Deputy Commissioner, Lohardagga, office at Lohardagga, P.O. and P.S. Lohardagga, District-Lohardagga. 3. Smt. Renuka Tigga, wife of not known to the petitioner, District Superintendent of Education, Lohardagga, P.O. and P.S. Lohardagga District Lohardagga .… … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shadab bin Haque, Advocate For the Opposite Party(s) : Mr. Manish Mishra, GP-V -------- Order No. 06 /Dated: 19th September 2025 The instant contempt case has been filed by the petitioner alleging willful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 07.02.2018 passed in W.P.(S) No. 7021 of 2016. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by the writ Court has been set-aside in L.P.A No. 255 of 2018 however, since the petitioner has preferred appeal before the Hon’ble Apex Court, therefore the case may be adjourned sine die 3. This Court does not feel to adjourn the case sine die. Accordingly, the instant contempt case is disposed of in view of the development, however, a liberty is given to the petitioner that if he succeeds in the Hon’ble Supreme Court, he may renew his prayer. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 19.09.2025 Amit