IN TH 211 Rajender S Sh. Krisha and anothe CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate Be Singh vs. T and others statements that :- COCP-1470-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.1470 o Date of decision nder Singh Versus Krishan Pratap Singh, R.P.F. Com another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Randeep Singh Dhull, Ad for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate f Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate wi Mr. Varun Sandhu, Advocate HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 23.9.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP-2123 h vs. The Commissioner Employees P others”, whereby the petition was di ments made by learned counsel for th “xxx xxx xxx 3. Learned counsel submit that they have a fund of petitioner with lying with authorities 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1470 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-30.10.2025 …..Petitioner . Commissioner-1, Chandigarh …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ll, Advocate ocate for respondent No.1. ate with ocate for respondent No.2. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- 21234-2024 titled as “Rajender yees Provident Fund Organizatio was disposed of on the basis of for the respondents to the effect nsel for respondents No.2 and 3 ve already deposited provident with authorities and money is ities since 2015. They have VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.06 12.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document informs tha which inclu and Rs.39, deposited i to the wha wherein the alongwith respondent learned cou at appropri Writ Court with while COCP-1470-2025 (O & M) further cleared all the authorities. 4. Learned counse submits that Competent grievance of the petiti have already been subm released within 3 mo petitioner has not subm within 1 month shall be xxx xxx xxx” Learned counsel for the respon ms that vide order dated 28.10.2025 h includes Employees share of provi Rs.39,844/- as Employer share with sited in the account of the petitioner. L e whatsapp chat between the petiti ein the petitioner has stated as follows “Thanks for your resp reconciliation done by hurry to withdraw th again.” Copy of the said order/Offic with whatsapp chat produced by ndent No.1 are taken on record. Co ed counsel for the petitioner. Registr propriate place in the paper-book. Learned counsel for the petiti Court order dated 23.9.2024 (Annexu while passing an Order/Office Note 2 l the objections raised by the unsel for respondent No.1 etent Authority would look into etitioner. If all the documents submitted, the amount would be months from today. If the ubmitted documents, intimation ll be sent to the petitioner. respondent No.1, on instructions, 2025 an amount of Rs.1,66,804/-, provident fund of Rs.1,26,960/- e with update interest has been ioner. Learned counsel also refers petitioner and the respondents, ollows :- response. I am analyzing the e by PF office and am not in the amount. Thanks once r/Office Note dated 28.10.2025 d by the learned counsel for rd. Copy thereof is supplied to egistry to tag/paginate the same petitioner submits that since the nnexure P-1) has been complied e Note dated 28.10.2025 by the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.06 12.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondent petition and made by l petition is October 30 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-1470-2025 (O & M) ndents-authority, nothing survives ion and the same may be disposed of. In view of the above noted by learned counsel for the petitio ion is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, 30, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 vives in the present contempt d of. noted facts and the submissions petitioner, the present contempt if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.11.06 12.19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document