Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12418 (CHH)

PARAS RAM SAHU v. SMT. RESHU GOUTAM

MAC/691/2020 · 2025-10-12

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:50897 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 691 of 2020 1 - Paras Ram Sahu S/o Dukhu Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kharkhena, Police Station Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Tractor), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ganga Prasad Kaushik S/o Late Chhedilal Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kharkhena, Police Station Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Trolley), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Reshu Goutam W/o Late Jitendra Aged About 21 Years Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Prem Narayan Goutam S/o Bhaiyalal Aged About 52 Years Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Shakuntala Goutam W/o Prem Narayan Goutam Aged About 50 Years Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Smita Goutam D/o Prem Narayan Goutam Aged About 26 Years S/o Ram Narayan, Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.10.13 18:36:51 +0530 2 5 - Sanjay Sahu S/o Late Ramayan Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Kharkhena, Police Station Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Driver), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None, in two rounds For Respondents : None, in two rounds Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 13/10/2025 1) As there is no representation on behalf of appellants even when the matter is taken up for hearing in second round, there is no other option left with the Court but to dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. 2) Consequently, the instant appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya