1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 356 of 2024 1. Dr. Rajpati Kumar Sinha, aged about 76 years, S/o late Bhagwati Kumar Sinha, R/o D/4, near Patel Chowk, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. – Harmu, P.S. – Argora, Ranchi, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. Lilawati Akhaury, aged about 73 years, W/o late Dr. Sailesh Kumar Akhaury, aged about years, S/o late A.J.C. Lal, R/o Indrapuri Road No. 1, Ratu Road, Ranchi, P.S. – Sukhdeo Nagar, P.O. – Hehal, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Dr. (Mrs.) Anju Sinha, aged about 79 years, W/o late Akhauri Arun Shekhar Sinha, R/o E-35, Ashok Vihar, Ranchi, P.O. – Ashok Nagar, P.S. – Argora, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Dr. Pandey Ravi Bhushan Prasad aged about 74 years, S/o Pandey Sadhav Nandan Prasad, R/o 204, Rameshwaram Complex, South Office Para, Doranda, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, Ranchi, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Mrs. Hansa Sharan, W/o late O.P. Sharan, R/o Flat No. 201, Block - Amritlok Complex, New Alkapuri, Behind D.P.S., Ranchi, P.O. – Hinoo, P.S. – Jagarnathpur, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand.… … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Rahul Purwar, S/o not known to the petitioners, The Principal Secretary, Science and Technology Department, Government of Jharkhand, Doranda, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Garima Singh, D/o not known to the petitioners, The Director, Higher Education, Human Resource Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C., Dhurwa, P.O. – Dhurwa, P.S. – Jagarnathpur, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Ajit Kumar Sinha, S/o not known to the petitionrs, The Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University, Ranchi, P.O. – G.P.O. P.S. – Kotwali, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Dr. M.C. Mehta, S/o not known to the petitioners, The Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi, P.O. – G.P.O. P.S. – Kotwali, District – Ranchi, Jharkhand. … … Opp. Parties --- CORAM :HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S. N. PATHAK --- For the Petitioners : Mr. T. N. Mishra, Advocate : Mr. Amresh Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Darshana Poddar Mishra, Advocate --- 05/03rd January 2025 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the University that the order of this Court has been fully complied with however the same has been disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. 2 T. N. Mishra that only differed DA has been paid but benefits of 4th , 5th and 6th pay revision have not been extended to the petitioners. 2. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by way of an affidavit that in view of the resolution of the State, notional benefits are to be paid prior to the year 2000 and actual benefits are to be paid from date of coming into existence of the State of Jharkhand which has already been extended to the petitioners. 3. In view of the fair submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, nothing remains to the interfered with. Therefore, contempt is hereby dropped. However, liberty is reserved with the petitioners to move afresh, if still aggrieved. 4. Accordingly, the instant Contempt Petition stands disposed of. (Dr. S. N. Pathak, J.) Aditi