[2025:RJ-JP:4055] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4058/2010 Shri Khandelwal Vaish Girls, Upper Primary School, Sansar Chandra Road, Jaipur Through Rajendra Dhamani Secretary Managing Committee Shri Khandelwal Vaish Girls Senior Secondary School, Sansar Chadra Road, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Director, Elementary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Bikaner 4. Dy. Director, Elementary Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur 5. Accountant General (Audit-I), C/o Office Of Accountant General, Near Statue Circle, Jaipur ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2668/2010 Swami Vivekanand Vidhya Mandir, D-131, Moti Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur Through Its Secretary Shri Pooran Chand Kumawat aged about 68 years S/o Late Shri Chotte Lal Kumawat, Resident Of A-1, Krishna Nagar, Gandhi Nagar Mod, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur 3. Director, Elementary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner 4. Dy. Director, Elementary Education, Jaipur Division, Jaipur 5. Accountant General Audit-I, C/o Office Of Accountant [2025:RJ-JP:4055] (2 of 2) [CW-4058/2010] General, Near Statue Circle, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankit Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba, AAG with Mr. Vinayam Saran Mr. Ramdhan and Ms. Shruti Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 29/01/2025 Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that in the additional affidavit filed by the State of Rajasthan, it is stated that no recovery is going to be effected against them and the amount has been written off. He submits that in view of the aforesaid, the writ petitions have become infructuous. The writ petitions are accordingly dismissed. The stay applications stand disposed of. However, dismissal of the writ petitions would not mean recovery of the amount so written off by the respondents as indicated in the additional affidavit filed by them. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /114-115