Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124104 (ALL)

DHEERAJ KUMAR v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/2068/2025 · 2025-02-19

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10831 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2068 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dheeraj Kumar Respondent :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Urban Development Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anshuman Singh Rathore,Rajeev Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sriniwas Bajpai Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents No.1 and 2 and Shri Shiniwas Bajpai, learned cousnel appearing for respondents No.3 and 4. 2. With the consent of the parties the matter is being decided finally. 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are two grievances namely (a) that despite the petitioner having been attached vide order dated 03.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-9 to the petition, being issued for petitioner's attachment at Krishna Devi Municipal Girls Inter College, Biswan, Sitapur, he has not been permitted to join and he would be submitting his joining within 3 days from today; and (b) that as the petitioner was working as a Clerk in Nagar Palika Parishad, Biswan, Sitapur, he is also having official accommodation but he is unable to vacate the same on account of examination of his children but states that he would be vacating the said accommodation positively by 15.04.2025. 4. Responding to aforesaid, Shri Sriniwas Bajpai, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 states that in case the petitioner presents himself for joining within a period of 3 days to the institution in question he would be permitted to join as earlier he never presented himself for joining. 5. So far as official accommodation is concerned, Shri Sriniwas Bajpai, learned counsel appearing for the respondents No.2 and 3 states that in case the petitioner vacates the accommodation by 15.04.2025, then he would not have any objection to the petitioner continuing to reside in the official accommodation by the aforesaid date. 6. Aforesaid statements are recorded. 7. So far as arrears of salary are concerned, it is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the salary has not been paid since October, 2024 as such the petitioner is permitted to submit a comprehensive representation before the respondent No.3 within a period of a week along with a certified copy of this order, and competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law within a period of next four weeks. 8. The writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench