SUNIL YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY./ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/1624/2025 · 2025-02-20
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124098 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 124098 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11038-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1624 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy./Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J.
1. Heard.
2. Petitioners apprehend sale-deed/will-deed by their mother in favour of their brother i.e. opposite party no. 5, therefore, this petition seeking mandamus to the Sub- Registrar, Tehsil Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar to inform the petitioners, if any, registered sale-deed or will-deed is being executed in favour of opposite party no. 5 by their mother, namely, Ramrati.
3. We fail to understand as to how such a relief is being claimed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, that too, based on apprehension.
4. Petitioners if claim that they have purchased the land in the name of their mother, then, they may seek appropriate relief before the appropriate Court if it is permissible in law.
5. The writ petition is dismissed. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 20.2.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench