Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 124042 (ALL)

CHEDAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE,LKO. AND 9 OTHERS

WPIL/148/2025 · 2025-02-20

Manish Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:11052 Court No. - 19 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 148 of 2025 Petitioner :- Chedan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue,Lko. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Tiwari,Arvind Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 4 and Mr. Tushar Gupta, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for opposite parties no. 5 & 6. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite parties no. 7 to 10 stands dispensed with. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for removal of alleged illegal encroachment by opposite parties no. 7 to 10 over the public utility land Gata No. 72 situated in Village- Sasna, Bhilaura Basu, Pargana- Fakharpur, Tehsil Kaiserganj, District- Bahraich and for reconstruction of kharanja marg. 3. With regard to such grievance, petitioner is granted liberty to file an appropriate application under Section 67 of the Revenue Code, 2006, which shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned expeditiously after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned. 4. In view of aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 20.2.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench