APHC010146542019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6403/2019 Between: 1. P.VENKATESHWAR REDDY,, S/O. P.YELLA REDDY, AGED 50 YRS., R/O. H.NO. 4/15, UYYALAWADA VILLAGE, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ORVAKAL RURAL POLICE STATION, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, ORVAKAL POLICE STATION, ORVAKAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or 2 direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in calling the petitioner to the Police Station and forcing to compromise civil matter is illegal, arbitrary and against law and consequently direct the respondents not to call the petitioner and his family members without following any due process of law and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondent not to interfere with the petitioner peaceful life without following due process of law by calling to police station and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT REDDY KODUMURY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6403 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 04.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader on written instructions would submit that their preliminary enquiry would reveal that the issue involved in the present Writ Petition is of civil in nature and therefore, the police will not interfere in such civil disputes. 3. Recording the submission made by learned Additional Government Pleader, this Writ Petition is closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate for necessary relief in the light of the Judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in M.Subramaniam Vs. S.Janaki and another1. No costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 11.08.2025 PSA 1 2020 (16) SCC 728 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6403 of 2019 Date: 11.08.2025 PSA