Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123980 (PNJ)

PHULAIL SINGH AND ORS v. PUNJAB STATE COOPERATIVE SUPPLY & MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. AND ORS.

CWP/3927/2017 · 2025-11-19

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-3927- IN TH 210 Phulail Singh Punjab State C CORAM: Present : HARPREET 1. Constitution o the record of respondent N ensure the r petitioners as 24.12.2008 (A a writ in the appropriate st (Annexure P 1 -2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGA Singh and others VERSUS State Cooperative Supply and Marketin HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR None for the petitioners. Mr. Vikas Arora, DAG, Punjab. REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present petition has been fil ution of India for issuance of a writ in t ord of impugned order dated 10.11.2 ent No.2 and to quash the same and fur the recasting of seniority of clerks ers as per their induction into service 008 (Annexure P-2) passed by respond in the nature of mandamus directin riate steps in order to ensure the compl ure P-2). NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH CWP-3927-2017 Date of decision:19.11.2025 .....Petitioner SUS arketing Federation Ltd and others .....Responden HARPREET SINGH BRAR een filed under Article 226/227 of the rit in the nature of certiorari to call for 0.11.2016 (Annexure P-9) issued by and further directing the respondents to clerks after including the names of service and in the light of order dated spondent No.3. Further for issuance of irecting the respondent No.3 to take compliance of order dated 24.12.2008 .2025 ioners ondents of the all for ed by nts to es of dated nce of take .2008 PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.21 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-3927- 2. behalf of the the case. 3. prosecution, s November P.C 2 -2017 The case was called twice but of the petitioners. It seems that petition Accordingly, the present writ pe tion, so also the pending miscellaneous 19, 2025 Whether speaking/r Whether Reportable e but none has put in appearance on etitioners are not interested in pursuing writ petition is dismissed for want of neous application, if any. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE king/reasoned. : Yes/No ortable. : Yes/No ce on rsuing ant of RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.11.21 12:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document