Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12398 (AP)

S. KISHORE KUMAR v. STATE OF AP

WP/8942/2020 · 2025-04-02

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010146682020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8942/2020 Between: S. Kishore Kumar and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T BALAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR (SC FOR VMRDA and MUDA) The Court made the following order: 1. The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayer: “To issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property situated in bearing Plot Nos.MIG II/72 and 79 an extent of 533 Sq. yards of the 1st Petitioner, Plot. No.MIG II/77 extent of 266.66 Sq. yards of the 2nd Petitioner, Plot.No.MIG II/75 extent 266.66 Sq. yards of the 3rd Petitioner, Plot.No.MIG II/74 extent of 222.95 Sq.yards of the 4th Petitioner, Plot.No.MIG II/78 extent of 266.66 Sq.yards of the 5th Petitioner, Plot. No.MIG II/73 extent 266.66 Sq.yards of the 6th Petitioner, Plot.No.MIG II/76 extent of 266.66 sq yards of the 7th Petitioner, Plot.No.MIG I/1/41 extent 456.44 Sq.yards and MIG.I/20 extent of 350 Sq.yards of respectively of the 8th Petitioner and Plot.No.MIG I/37 extent of 348.73 Sq.yards of the 9th Petitioner situated in Sy.No.188/3ABC in Desapatrunipalem Village Paravada Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, without issuing any notice and without following due procedure contemplated under law. 2. This Court while ordering notice on 20.05.2020, directed the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners’ lands. The said interim order is subsisting as on today. 3. The 4th respondent filed counter affidavit stating that, pursuant to the interim order dated 20.05.2020, the respondents have identified alternate lands for distribution of house site pattas to the eligible beneficiaries, by setting apart the subject lands. 4. In view of the averments made in the counter affidavit, the present writ petition is disposed of, as no further orders are necessary in terms of interim order dated 22.04.2020. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________ T.C.D.SEKHAR,J Date: 02.04.2025 ANS 43 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 8942/2020 Date: 02.04.2025 ANS