AMAN KUMAR ALIAS AMAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3661/2025 · 2025-05-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12397 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12397 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:13948 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.3661 of 2025
------ Aman Kumar @ Aman Kumar Srivastava, aged about 38 years, son of Santosh Kumar Srivastava @ Santosh Prasad Srivastava, resident of Qtr No.730/A, Lanka Colony, Dinapur, P.O. Khagaul, P.S. Khagaul, District Patna (Bihar). .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Akhouri Awinash Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 08-05-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ranchi Sadar P.S. Case No.236 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed cheating and criminal breach of trust by taking altogether Rs.7.25 lakhs for doing the interior decoration work of the informant but did not do the work and when the informant demanded back her money, the petitioner threatened her. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has filed Complaint Case No.4771 (C) of 2023 against the informant. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-17 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 27.03.2025 as is evident from para-17 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi in connection with Ranchi Sadar P.S. Case No.236 of 2023 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/