CHETNA PANDE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/1479/2025 · 2025-03-04
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123965 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12851 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1479 of 2025 Applicant :- Chetna Pande Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ratnesh Kant Agnihotri,Harshita Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard Sri Utkarsh Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ratnesh Kant Agnihotri, learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State of U.P. and perused the record. The present application has been seeking following main relief:-
"Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Learned Court of Judicial Magistrate (A.P) CBI to decide the protest petition of the petitioner (crime no. 609/2016) U/s 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, P.S wazirgunj, Lucknow within a time frame as directed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as indicated, including the period of pendency of the protest petition in issue, the instant application treating it to be under Section 529 Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is
disposed of with an observation that the concerned Court/Magistrate would make all endeavour in regard to concluding the proceedings of the protest petition in issue, expeditiously. With the aforesaid, the instant application is disposed of.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench