SHANTI GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BARABANKI AND OTHERS
WRIC/1648/2025 · 2025-02-20
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123959 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123959 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10961 Court No. - 19 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1648 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shanti Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Barabanki And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ishank Srivastava,Punit Kumar Srivastava,Rakesh Srivastava,Shashank Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to authority concerned for correction of entry in Khatauni pertaining to petitioner's property to the effect that the entry regarding attachment of property in pursuance of recovery be corrected.
3. Learned State Counsel on the basis of written instructions dated 17.02.2025, which are taken on record, submits that the relief so sought by petitioner has already been granted by correcting the entries made in petitioner's Khatauni.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner who perused the instructions admits the same.
5. In view thereof, nothing more remains to be adjudicated upon in the present writ petition which is consigned to record without any adverse effect upon benefits already granted to petitioner. Order Date :- 20.2.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench