SANJAY TIWARI @ SANJAY DINANATH TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. COLLECTOR, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/860/2025 · 2025-02-18
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123953 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123953 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10355 Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 860 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sanjay Tiwari @ Sanjay Dinanath Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Collector, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Laxmi Kant Pathak,Jyotindra Prakash Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties no.1 & 2 while notice on behalf of opposite party no.3 has been accepted by Mr. Mohan Singh, Advocate. In view of
order being passed, notices to opposite parties no.4 to 10 stand dispensed with.
2. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to court concerned for expeditious disposal of partition suit bearing no.1795 of 2020 instituted by petitioner under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
3. Further prayer for deciding application for extension of interim injunction granted earlier has also been made alongwith the direction to private opposite parties not to encroach upon ancestral land belonging to petitioner.
4. From a perusal of certified copy of order-sheet, it is not discernable whether all defendants in the suit proceedings have put appearance.
5. In view thereof, opposite party No.2 i.e. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Ayodhya is directed to decide the RST No.1795 of 2020, Computerized
Case
No.202404230001795; Sanjary Tiwari & Another versus Kedarnath Tiwari & Ors. expeditiously without granting any undue adjournments to either parties and to direct his office to bring on record service report regarding all the defendants.
6. Liberty is granted to petitioner to press his prayer no.2 and 3 before the authority concerned. Liberty is also granted to petitioner to approach this Court again in case of inordinate delay in decision of suit even once all the defendants have
put in appearance.
7. Benefit of this order shall be available to petitioner only in case he cooperates in early disposal of the proceedings.
8. With aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Subodh/- Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench