APHC010146112019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6361/2019 Between: 1. THANNIRU NAGALAKSHMI, W/O SHIVANAGARAJU, OCC HOUSE WIFE, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D.NO.39-10-1122, NEHRU NAGAR 5111 LINE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, GUNTUR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, LALAPETA POLICE STATION, LALAPETA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. CHAVAKULA LEELAVATHI, W/O SAMBASIVA RAO, R/O 3/2, NALLACHERUVU, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. ANKIREDDY SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 50 YEARS, NEAR SAMPATH NAGAR, AYYAPPASWAMY TEMPLE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. MANCHINEELLA ANJINEYULU, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O 3/2, NALLACHERUVU, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS Declan of 2nd respondent in not registering the FIR under Section 364, 506 and 509 01 read with 34 IPC of IPC r/w 34 of IPC against and not conducting investigation against the respondents No 4 to 6 basing on the police report dated 28.02.2019 of the petitioner is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and in violation of section 154 of Cr.P.C. and also in violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 respondent to register the FIR under Section 364, 506 and 509 of IPC read with 34 IPC of IPC r/w 34 of IPC and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to register the FIR under Section 364, 506 and 509 of IPC read with 34 IPC against the Respondent No. 4 to 6, pursuant to police report dated 28.02.2019 made by the petitioner pending disposal of the main Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TATA SINGAIAH GOUD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. E V V S RAVI KUMAR 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6361 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 06.08.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 13.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 6361 of 2019 Date: 13.08.2025 PSA