Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12388 (UTT)

KRIPAL SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2908/2025 · 2025-10-17

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:9375 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2908/2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. B.P. Nautiyal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Mr. Mohd. Matlub, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State/respondents. 2. According to petitioner, he is cultivating Government land abutting his bhumidhari land for the last 18-20 years. In this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the District Magistrate, Dehradun, to submit a proposal to State Government for allotting the said Government land to the petitioner. 3. Learned State Counsel has drawn attention of this Court to the sale deed of the land purchased by petitioner, where the boundaries of the land have been given. 4. Perusal of the boundary reveals that petitioner’s land is abutting forest land on one side, Song river on the other side and on remaining two sides, there is a road and thereafter forest and land belonging to Smt. Shakumbari Riyal. 5. Learned State Counsel is right in submitting that land is scarce in State of Uttarakhand and land is needed by the State 2025:UHC:9375 Government for opening of government offices, hospital, schools etc.; therefore, Government land cannot be allotted to a private individual. 6. This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned State Counsel. 7. The direction, as prayed for, cannot be granted by this Court. In fact, State Government should discontinue such practice. 8. The writ petition fails and is dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 17.10.2025 Mahinder/