ANIL KUMAR SONI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/1427/2025 · 2025-02-14
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123852 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:9690 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1427 of 2025 Applicant :- Anil Kumar Soni And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shri Prakash Verma,Pinki Devi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the State as well as Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant which is taken on record. Notice to respondent no. 2 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. By this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:- WHEREFORE, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the summoning order dated 05.07.2024 and entire proceeding in case no. 871/2016, U/s 419,420,468,471,504,506 I.P.C. Police Station Mankapur District- Gonda, passed by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate court no.1 Gonda contained in Annexure no. 1 and 2 to this petition. Perused the record. A perusal of the record, so also the statements recorded under Section 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., prima facie show complicity of the petitioner in commission of cognizable offence. There appears to be no illegality in the impugned order. The petition is devoid of merits and is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 14.2.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench