RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLRD/76/2024 · 2025-03-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123845 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123845 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13309 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 76 of 2024 Revisionist :- Ravi Shankar Prasad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Shobh Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Criminal Misc. Application No.IA/2/2024
1. This is an application filed by revisionist under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the petition.
2. On due consideration to the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed.
3. The delay is condoned.
Order on petition
1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
2. The present revision petition has been filed to set aside the impugned order dated 21.10.2023 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Faizabad in Case No.322/2022 arising out of Case Crime No.817/2020, , under Sections 420, 406, 504, 506 IPC , P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Ayodhya and further proceedings of the case in pursuance thereof.
3. Learned counsel for the revisionist, after arguing for some time, submits that present petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in
"Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal
(Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection.
4. In view of the above, prayer for quashing the impugned proceeding is refused. So far as other prayer is concerned, it is provided that in case the revisionist appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).
5. The petition is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench