INDRA DEV VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. CANE DEVELOPMENT SUGUR INDUSTRIES U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/1970/2025 · 2025-02-18
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 123830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10597 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1970 of 2025 Petitioner :- Indra Dev Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Cane Development Sugur Industries U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Singh,Sanjana Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Paramanand Asthana Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Paramanand Asthana, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 and 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on attaining the age of superannuation on 31.07.2011, vide the order of the respondent no. 2 dated 05.11.2024, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition, although the arrears pertaining to the sixth pay commission had been held to be admissible yet it has been indicated that the same would be paid to the petitioner in five half yearly installments. Contention is that the petitioner is a senior citizen aged about 71 years having retired long there cannot be any occasion for the respondents to pay the amount as due to him in installments.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Paramanand Asthana, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3 and 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench