Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123824 (ALL)

PAPPU KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

CRLR/205/2025 · 2025-02-17

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 205 of 2025 Revisionist :- Pappu Kashyap Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Suresh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the respondent State. Learned A.G.A. has submitted that the impugned order has not been passed under Chapter 9 Cr.P.C., therefore, the criminal revision will not lie. The revisionist can seek appropriate remedy as available under law. Perused the record. Perusal of the record shows that the impugned order does not appear to have been filed under Chapter IX Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the revisionist prays for withdrawal of the revision and seeks liberty to avail appropriate remedy as provided under law. In view of the above, the criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Office is directed to return certified copies of the documents filed along with the revision to learned counsel for the revisionist. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench