APHC010145812013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27100/2013 Between: 1. YAKASIRI KANNAMMA W/O. PENCHALAIAH,, AGE 50 YEARS, AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O. CHATAGOTLA VILLAGE, PODALAKURU MANDAL, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY, LTD.(A.P.S.P.D.C.L.) REP. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN - CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER ZONE A P S P D C L TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER OPERATION CIRCLE, A.P.S.P.D.C.L., NELLORE, S.P.S.R.NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents Corporation in not constructing the 33/11 KV Sub Station at Toderu village, Podalakuru Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore District, in pursuance to the letter of the 3rd respondent in Lr.No.SE(0)/NLR/ADEComml/ F. / D.No.C1323/ 13, Dt. 02.09.2013 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to construct the 33/11 KV Sub Station in aforesaid Toderu village and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 33562 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to construct the 33/11 KV Sub Station at Toderu village, Podalakuru Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore District, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y KANAKALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL 2. The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 26.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 30.06.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27100/2013 Date: 30.06.2025 KA