Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123802 (ALL)

THAKUR JI MAHARAJ VIRAJMAAN SHIVALA, THRU. THRU. SARVARAKAR 1. ABHAY SHANKAR MISHRA AND ANOTHER v. BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. LKO. THRU. CHAIRMAN AND OTHERS

A227/821/2025 · 2025-02-17

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10015 Court No. - 19 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 821 of 2025 Petitioner :- Thakur Ji Maharaj Virajmaan Shivala, Thru. Thru. Sarvarakar 1. Abhay Shankar Mishra And Another Respondent :- Board Of Revenue U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amol Kumar Srivastava,Shivang Dwivedi,Shivanshu Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners, learned State Counsel for opposite parties no.1 to 3 and Mr. Abhay Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief on behalf of Mr. Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for opposite party no.4. In view of order being passed, notices to opposite parties no.5 to 8 stand dispensed with. 2. Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to authority concerned for expeditious disposal of applications preferred by petitioner for interim relief in Revision No.2773 of 2023. Further prayer for expeditious disposal of revision and for a direction to opposite parties to remove encroachment over the property in question and to maintain status quo has also been sought. 3. In view of submissions by learned counsel for petitioner that there is grave urgency in the matter due to which petitioner filed applications dated 08.01.2025 and 15.01.2025 seeking interim relief, the same is required to be decided expeditiously. 4. In view thereof, Opposite Party no.1 i.e. Chairman, Board of Revenue Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow is directed to decide pending applications dated 08.01.2025 and 15.01.2025 preferred in Revision No.2773 of 2023, Computerized No.R20231046002773; Thakurji Maharaj Virajman Shivala & Ors versus Smt. Radha Rani & Ors. expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date report regarding service upon all the opposite parties is brought on record of the proceedings. 5. In the meantime, the authority concerned may consider grant of interim injunction to the revisionist in case he is able to make out a case for same. 6. Endavour shall be made to decide revisional proceeding expeditiously without granting any undue adjournment to either party in case there is no other legal impediment. 7. Benefit of this order shall be available to petitioner only in case they cooperate in early disposal of the proceedings. 8. With aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Subodh/- Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench