Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 123797 (ALL)

SMT. SUMITRA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. AGRICULTURE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/1948/2025 · 2025-02-19

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:10819 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1948 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Sumitra And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Agriculture Education And Research Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Shukla,Aneeta Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prashant Kumar Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent No. 1 and Shri Satyanshu Ojha learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Satyanshu Ojha, Advocate is taken on record. 2. With the consent of the parties, the matter is being decided finally. 3. There is consensus at Bar that the matter in dispute is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Writ A No.692 of 2025 In Re Ram Kishor Yadav & Anr vs State of U.P. & Ors, decided on 21.01.2025. 4. At this stage Shri Satyanshu Ojha, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 states that this Court may indicate that the benefit of the this order would only be admissible to those persons who are still working and are getting the benefit of the 6th pay commission. 5. To the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing that the petitioners be entitled for the benefit of the judgment of this Court in the case of Ram Kishor Yadav (supra) provided they are still working and are in receipt of the benefit of the 6th Pay Commission. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench